How our AI cybersecurity platform design helped Cracken make offensive security feel operational
Project:
the project
A website to make a new security category sell itself
Cracken is an offensive, agentic AI platform operating in a category the market has not yet named. Its positioning, attack as the foundation of defense, is a technical conviction: the only way to defend against sophisticated adversaries is to operate with the same offensive logic they use. The website needed to establish this from the first interaction and win two skeptical buyers at once: the operators who judge whether the product is real and the executives who sign for it.
Lazarev.agency designed the full website with a coherent product narrative and a unified visual language serving both audiences without splitting the site or diluting either message.
Here’s how we achieved that.
The Project’s
Discovery Phase
Built a living 3D visualization to make an agentic AI system feel operational
For an agentic AI security platform, abstraction is the biggest credibility risk: red teams dismiss any capability they cannot see operating.
We built the Cracken as a living visualization, an active system reconstructing and responding in real time, its behavior shifting with context: analytical and restrained in intelligence sections, denser and more charged at high-urgency moments. The visualization gives skeptical technical evaluators visible proof of a working system before they reach a single line of specification, so they meet Cracken already believing it is real.
Created an entry point to a new category of cybersecurity
A category-creating product has a homepage problem: a features-first layout asks visitors to judge something they have no framework for, and they default to slotting it beside tools they already know.
Our team built the Cracken homepage as a sequential entry. It first sets the threat context, then shows why defensive-only approaches no longer hold, and only then reveals how Cracken takes control through automation and agent-based logic. Each section raises the pressure, so visitors move from recognizing the problem to accepting the offensive position as the logical answer.
By the time the product appears, buyers already believe the category is real, which is the difference between a homepage producing qualified pipeline and one producing confused exits.
Designed a scalable architecture to keep buyers oriented
Enterprise security deals close over weeks or months, across many return visits and links forwarded to colleagues, so the website has to hold a buyer's confidence the whole way. When the pages feel like disconnected pieces, buyers lose the thread and rebuild context every time they come back, and each lost thread is a chance for the deal to cool.
We designed the Cracken site as one hierarchical system, each page extending the same product story from a new angle so nothing contradicts or repeats. Buyers stay oriented and keep moving toward a decision, and Cracken can add pages as it grows without breaking the experience or paying to rebuild it. The architecture protects pipeline now and the marketing investment later.
Why information architecture is the UX superhero under cover
Constructed a unified visual language to win different audiences
Two very different buyers judge the same security site for opposite reasons. Technical operators and red teams want proof the product is real and powerful: speed, depth, the ability to find exploits. Executives and CISOs want the reverse: control, manageable risk, accountability. Building one version for each would split the site into two halves neither group fully trusts, and a compromise between them convinces no one.
We built a single system for Cracken carrying both readings at once, an underlying order executives read as scale and control and a sense of live activity technical buyers read as real capability. The same pages satisfy both, so a deal keeps moving when it reaches the next stakeholder, with the credibility argument already won.
Fintech
Lazarev. agency offers comprehensive digital design services. Discover our range of related expertise supported by impactful case studies.
More Startups Cases
FAQ
How should AI cybersecurity platform design communicate technical credibility to both security operators and executive buyers?
Security platforms face a procurement reality most B2B products don't: the people evaluating technical credibility and the people signing the contract are different, arrive with different expectations, and are often skeptical for opposite reasons. Red teams and technical operators read a website for evidence the product is real. Executives and CISOs read the same site for evidence of control, scale, and organizational trustworthiness. A site optimized for one audience at the cost of the other loses a critical part of the buying process.
In the Cracken project, Lazarev.agency resolved this through a single visual system carrying different meanings to each group simultaneously: structural order for executive audiences, stylistic tension and system-behavior signals for technical ones. For enterprise security software companies designing for a dual procurement audience, this layered approach is more defensible than splitting the site by persona or defaulting to a compromise neither group finds fully convincing.
What is the most effective way to design a website for an AI platform operating in a category buyers haven't defined yet?
Category-creating products have a homepage problem: a features-first structure asks visitors to evaluate something they don't yet have a framework for understanding. If the category itself isn't established before the product is introduced, the most common outcome is a visitor concluding the product is a variation of something they already know, which is exactly the positioning a new category needs to avoid.
Working on the Cracken project, we structured the homepage as a sequential experience establishing the problem's logic before introducing the product as the system built around it. Visitors move through a progression placing them inside the operational reality Cracken addresses, so they arrive at the product introduction already convinced the category is real. For AI-native defense platforms and B2B SaaS companies entering undefined markets, this sequencing is the difference between a homepage generating qualified pipeline and one producing confused exits.
How can 3D visualization be used in cybersecurity and AI platform design to build product credibility?
Abstract technology claims are now so common in security marketing they have become nearly meaningless to technical buyers. Credibility requires evidence of what the technology does, communicated in a form technical audiences find convincing before they read a specification sheet.
In the Cracken project, the 3D visualization was designed to change character based on page context: fluid and analytical in intelligence sections, sharp and pressurized in high-urgency transitions, making the system's operational states visible.
For enterprise security software companies investing in 3D as a design element, the distinction worth making is between visualization as decoration and visualization as product communication. The former adds visual weight without commercial value. The latter shortens the distance between first impression and qualified interest.
How does website architecture affect the sales process for complex B2B security products?
Complex B2B security products are rarely sold through a single page visit. Buyers return multiple times, share links with colleagues, and move between sections in a non-linear order determined by their specific evaluation criteria. A site where The Platform, Solutions, and About pages feel like disconnected sections rather than parts of a coherent system creates friction at every return visit, buyers lose the narrative thread and have to reconstruct context each time.
For Cracken, Lazarev.agency built the site architecture around a unified visual and semantic framework allowing each page to extend the product narrative from a different angle without contradicting or duplicating the others. This architectural coherence is a sales enablement decision as much as a design one, a site functioning as a connected system keeps buyers oriented through a procurement process lasting weeks or months.
What visual design principles work best for offensive security and red team platforms targeting enterprise buyers?
Offensive security platforms occupy an unusual design position: the product's value depends on communicating aggression, capability, and operational depth, qualities most enterprise software design actively avoids. Standard enterprise SaaS aesthetics signal safety and approachability, which is the wrong register for a platform selling attack capability as a defense strategy. The design challenge is making a product feel genuinely powerful without becoming visually unstable or unreadable for the executives who ultimately approve the purchase.
Let’s take Cracken as an example: we used red as pressure, glitch and particle effects as evidence of system activity, and strict grid and navigation logic as the structural layer communicating organizational control. So, we delivered a site reading as aggressive and technically credible to red teams while remaining ordered and trustworthy to executive buyers. For AI cybersecurity platform design targeting enterprise procurement processes, this balance between operational intensity and organizational credibility is the central visual problem and it requires deliberate layering.
How should B2B SaaS companies approach website design when their product requires explaining a new mental model to buyers?
Most B2B SaaS websites assume buyers arrive with a formed opinion about the category and a checklist of features to evaluate. Products requiring buyers to adopt a new mental model before they can evaluate the product correctly cannot rely on this assumption. The website itself has to do the conceptual work of establishing the framework, otherwise buyers default to comparing the product against existing categories it doesn't belong to.
In the Cracken project, the homepage was structured to establish "attack as the foundation of defense" as a logical position before introducing any product capability. Visitors move through threat context, the failure of defensive-only approaches, and the offensive logic underpinning Cracken's design, in a sequence making the product's positioning feel inevitable.
How does design investment affect pipeline quality for enterprise cybersecurity companies?
Enterprise cybersecurity procurement involves multiple stakeholders, long evaluation cycles, and high-risk decisions where trust is a prerequisite for any commercial conversation. A website failing to establish credibility with both technical evaluators and executive sponsors creates friction at the top of the funnel, prospects exit before they qualify themselves, or arrive at a first conversation still uncertain whether the product is serious.
The AI cybersecurity platform design for Cracken Lazarev.agency delivered was built to make the product's category, capability, and credibility legible from the first interaction, through visual behavior, page structure, and a unified design system serving both audience types simultaneously. For enterprise security software companies investing in a website rebuild, the pipeline impact is measurable in qualification rate: a site making the right impression on the right buyers produces fewer but more qualified conversations, which is the metric determining whether a sales team's time is well spent.

